COMMUNITY PROFILE
JANUARY 2001
Published by
Shirehampton Public Hall Community Association Station Road
Shirehampton Bristol BS11 9TW
Back to Home Page Information Page
2.
Demographic Information
2.1 Sources
2.2 Caveats
2.3 What Does The Demographic Information
Tell Us?
3.
Community Groups
3.1 Shirehampton Community Group
3.2 Shirehampton Public Hall Community Association
3.3 The Cotswold Community Association
3.4 Lower Shirehampton Tenants Association
3.5 Penpole Tenants Association
3.6 The Churches
3.7 Beachley Walk Centre
3.8 Avon University Settlement Advice Service
4.
Community Infrastructure
4.1 Partnership Working
4.2 Information Providers
4.3 Economic Development
4.4 Café Culture
4.5 Shirehampton Traders Association
4.6 Facilities For Older People
4.7 Education
4.8 Groveleaze Youth Club
4.9 Leisure Facilities
5.
Summary Of Main Issues Raised By
Profile
6.
Recommendations For The Future
1.
Introduction
This Community Profile is the result of four month's research into the social needs of Shirehampton. From September 1999 till August 2000 I worked as the Community Worker at the Public Hall in Station Road. It became apparent during this time there was no up to date Community Profile/Social Audit of Shirehampton so the Public Hall Community Association applied to Bristol City Council s Sustainable Neighbourhood Fund for funding to undertake this profiling exercise. We were successful and obtained six months funding which expires in February 2001. I am grateful therefore to both the Public Hall Community Association and the Sustainable Neighbourhood Fund for supporting and financing this work.
Plus a large number of individuals unconnected to any particular organisation who are often to be found in Shire s popular cafes!
2. 1991 Census: Selected Statistics and 1991 Census: Small Area Statistics: Avon C.C. Planning Dept.
3. Avon Health and Lifestyle Survey.
4. Birth Statistics: Bristol and District Health Authority.
5. North Area 1997 Profile: A statistical profile of North Bristol: Bristol and District Health Authority.
6. A Community Health Profile of North West Bristol: Primary Care Group: March 2000.
7. Community Profile of Shirehampton: Joanne Sambrook Health Visitor: May 1993
8. Inequalities of Health in the City of Bristol: Peter Townsend: Bristol University: 1934
9. Bristol North West District by Super-Profile Lifestyle: Enumeration area statistics: 1991
10. Quality of Life Indicators in Bristol 2000: Sustainability Update: Bristol City Council
11. Avon mouth Ward Profile: Bristol City Council
12. Kingsweston Ward Profile: Bristol City Council
13. 1998 Index of Local Deprivation- enumeration index: DETR
14. Combined Index: Rank of Multiple Deprivation Avon Wards: DETR
15. Standardised Mortality Ratios 1991-1995: Public Health Medicine: UBHT
16. Index of Local Deprivation: Avon Wards by Income: DETR
17. Council Tax Benefits November 1999: Housing Services: Bristol City Council
18. DETR 1998 Index of Local Deprivation
19. Unemployed Claimants August 2000: DETL Bristol City Council
20. 1991 Census 100% Data by enumeration district: DETL Bristol City Council
21. Avon Community Health Web: North West Bristol P.C.G. : Nov.1999
22. Planning For Real: Report on a Neighbourhood Survey of Sea Mills and Coombe Dingle 1998-1999
23. A study of Early Years Provision in Lawrence Weston and surrounding areas Sea Mills, Shirehampton and Avonmouth : Autumn 1999: Sally Jaeckle
24. Sea Mills Garden Suburb: Suggested improvements: April 1999
25. S.H.A.W.L ( Shirehampton, Avonmouth and Lawrence Weston Lifelong Learning Network) Minutes 1999-2000
26. SHIRE Newspaper back issues till present.
27. Shirehampton Public Hall Community Association: Annual reports and Minutes.
28. Shirehampton After-School Club: Potential user survey 1999.
29. Health Improvement Programme 2000-2003: Avon Health Authority
30. Shirehampton Public Hall: The Way Forward: C and G Consultants April 1998
As with all
statistics these come with warnings on interpretation. Firstly much, though by no means
all, of the available information is based on the 1991 Census. Wherever possible I have
identified sources of more recent data. Secondly much of the information is available only
at electoral ward level Shirehampton falls within the Avonmouth Ward and thus it is often
impossible to distinguish Shirehampton and Avonmouth within the available data e.g. Ward
Profiles and the Quality of Life Indicators by Electoral Ward.
However
thanks to the Strategic and Citywide Policy unit within the City Council s Environment,
Transport and Leisure Directorate I have managed to access some extremely valuable
information broken clown to Shirehampton and Barracks Lane and excluding Avonmouth. This
Information is further broken down to Enumeration District levels within this area which
are generally the smallest areas for which data is available. I believe this information
will be of great use in targeting future resources to those areas most in need of them mad
in obtaining the necessary funding to meet those needs.
A number of the most important documents are included as appendices but others mentioned but not included are available from me at the Public Hall.
Joanne Sambrook Community Health Profile
In
1998 the DETR published its Index of Local Deprivation at Electoral Ward Level The
indicators used for this Index are included as Appendix 1 and the Wards are ranked out of
a total of 143 Wards within the old Avon County Council area. Thus Lawrence Hill was
ranked at No.1 as the most deprived Ward within Avon and Bradley Stoke at No.143 as the
least deprived. On the Combined Index, including an average of all deprivation indicators,
Avonmouth Ward was ranked at No.20 within Avon.
When
the DETR compiled its Rank of Index of Multiple Deprivation for every Ward in England
Avonmouth was ranked at 1955 which puts it well within the top 25% of the most deprived
Wards in England.
Now, as already mentioned, the Avonmouth Ward includes both Shirehampton and Avonmouth so it is impossible to disentangle the two communities statistically when the information is only available at Electoral Ward Level However the 1998 Index of Local Deprivation was also broken down to Enumeration District level so that we can not only look at Shirehampton separately from Avonmouth but also compare different parts of Shirehampton with each other. These statistics are reproduced as APPENDIX 2 and are probably the most significant of all the data available to us. They show very, very wide variations of deprivation within Shirehampton itself. The area North of the High Street towards Portway School and including the tower blocks and the area covered by the Penpole Tenants Association shows high levels of deprivation indeed. The two Enumeration Districts here are ranked at 109 and 209 out of 814 Wards in Avon, in the top 12% of all the districts in the South West and in the top 25% of all the enumeration districts in the country in terms of deprivation. The four other districts of substantial council housing stock off the Lower High Street also show significant levels of deprivation. In contrast other areas around the Portway show levels of comparative affluence.
The
Avonmouth Ward Profile and the 2000 Quality of Life Indicators in Bristol Sustainability
Update Report fill in some of the further details. A major concern is the health of the
Wards residents. The standardised mortality ratio (SMR) for premature deaths (all
causes), that is for people dying between the age of 15 and 64, shows a significantly
higher figure compared to the Bristol average. Significantly high in these terms means not just above average but
high enough for the need for some explanation to be sought. The Ward also contains an
above average number of residents with a disability or long term illness and an above
average number of referrals to Social Services for both children and adults. At the other
end of the age scale the Health Profile shows a sustained and above average number of low
birthweight babies. Whether the figures for
premature death and low birthweight are related to pollution from the works at Avonmouth
is not proven at present but the presence of both indicators would suggest real poverty in
the area.
The
Ward s economy is very buoyant with the number of jobs outstripping the available labour
force which has led to a lower than average unemployment rate of 3.7% as against the
Bristol average of 4.7%. The Ward has the 3rd highest number of jobs available locally and
below average numbers commuting to work elsewhere which again reflects the availability of
jobs locally. These high levels of employment would seem to be in contrast with our
previous findings of comparatively high deprivation levels. This situation is clarified
when we look at the patterns of employment in detail The majority of jobs in the local
economy are manual unskilled, semi-skilled,
skilled with a low level of families in the
local population headed by wage earners in managerial positions or the professions. These
figures are backed when we look at the figures from 1998 for percentage of citizens with
no educational or technical qualifications. The Ward comes in at the highest level of
unqualified workers on this table with more than double the Bristol average of 18%
unqualified and rising as high as 46% of the workforce without qualifications. What we see
therefore is an overwhelmingly manual workforce, low qualified, but in regular paid work
rather than claiming benefits. The buoyant employment statistics mask therefore the real
problems of Shirehampton where many people are caught in the Poverty Trap of earnings
levels just above those that would qualify them for access to a whole range of benefits.
This was perceptively noted by Health Visitor Joanne Sambrook in her Health Profile of
1994 ( see quote at top of page) and reflected in
the current frustrations of local Health Visitors who see
large caseloads but not the dedicated resources to manage them effectively because the health indicators are weighted to take
account of access to benefits rather than low income families. An acknowledgement of these
facts may well be the key to understanding how we can go about improving the quality of life for many people in Shirehampton.
The
patterns of housing tenure show a very stable community with low levels of transient
population due to little available privately rented accommodation and houses in multiple
occupation. Homelessness and demand for rehousing were well below average although the
1994 Housing Survey showed above average levels of unfit homes (15%). The 1998 Housing
Survey showed below average levels of tenants claiming housing benefits. Owner occupiers
accounted for 67% of the housing stock and council housing accounted for another 27% with
only 1% Housing Association owned. There are many
people who have lived in Shirehampton all their lives, with strong local family links, and
this too makes for a stable community with a strong sense of community and their own
history and separateness from the rest of Bristol.
2.3.5 CRIME AND DISORDER
Between 1994/95 and
1997/98 crime increased in the ward by up to 16% but crime levels are still low compared
to the rest of Bristol The statistical evidence does
not back up the widely held view that Shirehampton is becoming increasingly disorderly especially along the High Street area in the
evenings and the widespread fear of crime and
concern for community safety issues amongst older people. There is no doubt that, like
many areas, there is a different feel to Shirehampton in the daytime than in the evening
when groups of young people cause alarm to many older people whether they are behaving
anti-socially or not. For many shop keepers along the High Street anti-social behaviour,
theft and vandalism are their major problems and these spill over into neighbouring
residential areas especially those immediately North of the High Street.
2.3.6 POPULATION
According to the 1991 Census 100% data by Enumeration District for
Shirehampton and Barracks Lane Shirehampton has a population of 6,867 made up of 48% males
and 52% females. The population by age group reflects the average for each age in Bristol
generally except for the 16-34 year olds where the figures are below the Bristol average
by some 3%.
98.8%
of the population is white with correspondingly below Bristol average levels for minority
ethnic communities.
2.3.7 HOUSING AND HEALTH --- HOUSING
The
well designed Area Housing Office in Napier Road services the council housing stock of
Avonmouth, Shirehampton and Sea Mills. Demand for council housing in Shirehampton is
consistently high and there is a steady flow of occupiers exercising their Right to
Buy . There are no general urgent problems with the housing stock although wail-tie houses and some of the steel houses on the Portway
will need attention long-term. There are comparatively few flats the majority of the accommodation being family
housing. The Housing Office also notices the scarcity of rented accommodation in the
private sector and the poor quality of that there is mainly
above shops. These two factors make for a stable population with often three generations
of the same family living in Shirehampton. A
sensitive allocations policy is intended to keep the character of each part of
Shirehampton. Thus re-housing on the Cotswold Estate, south of the Portway, is mainly on
medical grounds for older people and sustains an elderly community with none of the
anti-social problems which affect the High Street area. Barwick House, one of the tower
blocks on the Ridge, is now mainly used to house the over-50s to lessen the problems of
having young children in tower blocks.
It
is around The Ridge that many complaints that reach the office originate including
those of racial harassment of young families by children. Many of the problems occur not
only in the council owned blocks but in those properties owned by the four Housing
Associations. It may be because of the comparatively low numbers of houses owned by each
of the Housing Associations or the fact of having four different Housing Associations but
in general they take a more hands-off attitude to anti-social behaviour by their tenants
and their visitors than the Area Housing Office does.
There
is no doubt that if the problems along The Ridge are to be successfully addressed then the
Housing Associations will have to get their act together a lot better than at
present.
The Housing Office undertakes Community Safety initiatives with the police and works with anti-racist organisations like SARI on racial harassment cases. The Area Office also acts as the Housing Benefit claims centre and notices similar patterns of employment and income levels as picked up by the Ward Profiles and the Quality of Life indicators. Many elderly retired tenants have low-level private pensions often from jobs in Avonmouth which means they have very little access to Housing Benefits and rebates. Again a case of low income levels but just above the levels to qualify for benefits. In the working population people are often employed in contract work at Avonmouth and often laid off at short notice. Periods of employment can be for weeks or months but then followed by two or three weeks unemployment before the next contract comes along. This often involves slipping into rent arrears in those times again a pattern of low-waged manual work which often precludes access to benefits. The Area Office provides a good level of service sensitive to the particular needs of Shirehampton. The spacious foyer area is well designed with an array of information leaflets about benefits, housing and community activities in Shire.
Together
with Shirehampton Health Centre they jointly win The Best and most Informative Foyer
in Shire award.
Shirehampton
Health Centre provides the focal point in the community for the majority of health needs.
Besides doctors there is access to a full range of other health professionals District and School nurses, Social Worker,
Community Midwife, physiotherapist, dentist, dietician, clinical psychologist,
chiropodist, health promotion activities, family planning, speech therapist, community
psychiatric nurse and a full programme of clinics and
classes. it is also the base for the Health Visiting Team and through their Community
Profiling exercises and their home visits to all families in the area with children under 5 they probably have a better
understanding of the community health needs of the area than anyone else.
There
are 4 Health Visitors at the Health Centre per 1000 children under 5 as against the
District average of 4.53. This missing out on a half time post may not seem much but for
the Health Visitors it can lead to a feeling of being overworked with a large caseload and stressed out. This combined with a
feeling that the true health needs of the area are not properly understood or addressed
can lead to further stress and low morale.
Besides
picking up on the alarming health statistics of well above Bristol average levels of
premature death, low birthweight babies, and high levels of residents with long term
illness the Health Visitors are aware of the need for high levels of support for the many
young families in the area struggling on low incomes. Joanne Sambrook in her Community
Health Profile of Shirehampton picked up on the same patterns of poverty caused not by
claiming benefits only 3% of caseloads are
existing solely on state benefits - but living on
low incomes, as the Housing Office has perceptively done.
She
wrote Living on a low income presents as great, if not greater problem, in this
area than living on state benefits. If a family is receiving Income Support for example,
although poor in terms of income, receipt of this benefit opens the door to other very
precious benefits such as free school meals, free dental
treatment, full exemption for Council Tax and lots more. Even Family Credit offers some
advantages in terms of keying into other areas of the benefits system. All of which is
totally inaccessible to someone existing on a low income.
If
you take note of only one paragraph of this report take note of the one above for it is
the key to understanding the hidden poverty of many in Shire and the consequent lack of
any substantial funding put into the area by government programmes accessed through the
Local Authority.
The
Health Visitors are also concerned about the lack of pre-school facilities for children
noting only the two Mother and Toddler Groups at St. Bernards School (twice a week term time only) and the Baptist Church (twice weekly). There are also only the two playgroups
Station Road Playgroup at the Public Hall and
the morning playgroup at Beachley Walk. The Health Visitors also run an additional drop-in
session for toddlers at the nearby St. Mary s Church Hall.
Following
the report on the Inequalities of Health in Bristol by Professor Peter Townsend in
1984 which looked at the relationship between health and social deprivation it was
initially concluded that industrial pollution was a contributory factor to a higher Infant
Mortality Rate in the Avon Ward as it was then known but in 1985 a report by Dr. Stewart
Brown revealed the major cause of infant mortality was Sudden Infant Death. The effect on
the health of the people of Shirehampton from the pollution at Avonmouth and from traffic
pollution on the busy roads and motorways can only be argued over but is certainly high
time a thorough study was undertaken.
To
quote some statistics from the Primary Care Groups recent Health Profile of North Bristol
about the Avonmouth Ward:
Death
rates from heart disease are significantly high in Avonmouth.
Rates for all causes of death in the under 75s are significantly high in
Avonmouth...
The Bristol rate of child protection was 5.2 per 1000 children at January 1998.
Avonmouth had above average rates at this time.
The Townsend Score is a deprivation index based on 4 census variables. The
Practice of Dr. R.G.Taylor and partners at Shirehampton has a Townsend Score greater than
80 which means that at least 80% of practices in Avon have a lower score i.e. they are
more affluent.
I think the link between poverty and ill health in Shirehampton is undeniable.
Back to contents
The group meets bi-monthly to discuss issues of local
community concern with section leaders on Planning, Environment, Community Care, Highways,
Youth and Schools and Law and Order. It also hosts meetings of the Police Consultative
Committee and reports back from the local Neighbourhood Watch schemes. On occasion it will
hold meetings to discuss issues of special local concern such as the proposed Avonmouth
Incinerator or the future of the swimming pool and on these issues attendance can be very
high. In some ways the group attempts to perform the functions of a Parish Council and at
a time when the City Council is looking at ways of increasing local democracy then the
possibility of looking at a Parish Council for Shirehampton might present itself. Im
sure an element of Home Rule for Shire would come out well on a local
referendum on a Parish Council proposal The City Councils Democracy Commission is
currently canvassing for views on options such as Parish Councils before issuing its
final report in March so any views need to be made known quickly.
3.2 SHIREHAMPTON PUBLIC HALL COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
The
Public Hall opened in 1904 and has played an important role in the life of Shire ever
since. Since 1988 it has been managed by a local voluntary management committee though the
building is still owned and maintained by Bristol City Council It hosts many of the long
standing Shire community groups - Station Road playgroup, The Evergreens, the Grainger
Players, Shire Stitchers, Shire Community group - as well as a yearly cycle of
exhibitions, performances and one-off events. Recently it has become the base for the
local Community Education office (formerly at Twyford House and Stoke Lodge) and a range
of basic skills classes. Again a successful example of keeping an important service
provider in the local community by moving to another building rather than losing its base
in the area altogether.
Funding is currently being sought from the National
Lottery Charities Board for the Shire After-School Club which will serve the schools of
St. Bernards, Shirehampton Primary and Avon Primary and this should provide a much needed
child care facility for working parents from April 2001. Increased use of the Hall brings
its own problems of success in that regular weekday use of the Hall means an inability to
respond to requests for one-off meetings or regular events as the Hall is now operating
close to full capacity except at weekends.
Following on a Public consultation exercise in April
1998 the Community Association, with the support of the City Councils Community
Development unit, has started to take on a broader view of its remit within Shirehampton.
The employment of a community worker first, then in addition a Community Profiler sees the
Association looking beyond its building management remit to look at wider unmet social
needs in Shirehampton. It realises that no one organisation can meet these needs and hence
the attempt to build working partnerships on the outcomes of the Community Profile and
possible first steps toward& setting up a Community Development Trust in Shirehampton.
Another
remarkable Shire story of longevity and self-reliance in a community group. A community
building of some kind has stood here since World War One and there are photos of
cavalrymen to prove it! The area is predominantly populated by Senior Citizens who are
very happy to live in such a safe and attractive location by the river. There are few
young families around and the area suffers from none of the fear of crime felt by
pensioners along the High Street.
The
Cotswold Centre building is run by an indefatigable group of senior citizens in their 70s
and 80s and provides entertainment, bingo, Keep Fit and Line Dancing. The Centre receives
no grant funding of any kind and meets all their own bills for cleaning and building
repairs from its own resources. It is basically a happy organisation run by happy people
in a happy location so if it aint broke dont fix it!.
This
Tenants organisation is no longer active though the ex-chair remains a strong advocate of
local community interests. Unlike Penpole Tenants Association or Cotswold Community
Association the Lower Shire Tenants Association has never had premises of its own -
meeting in the Housing Office in Napier Road or Jim ONeill House. The lack of a
community facility in the Barracks Lane/Beanacre area is strongly felt. There is also a
feeling of disconnection or left outness from the rest of Shire and a feeling
that the area is in some sort of inexorable decline. This feeling of being slightly left
out of things finds an echo in Avon Primary School tucked away as it is down Barracks
Lane-almost not sure whether its in Shirehampton or Avonmouth and serving both
communities. A purpose built new community facility - and finding anywhere to put it
-would seem to be an unlikely option at the moment but a tie-up between school and local
community would make sense - offering use of school buildings in the evenings for
example.
The
Tenants Association has also complained about anti-social behaviour by youths coming down
from Lawrence Weston along the back lanes and slow police response times. Many older
people have community safety concerns and the deprivation indices show real social needs
in the area. The siting of the new Welcome to Shirehampton Village signs half
way up the High Street has compounded the view that the area is left out from the rest of
Shire and a real effort needs to be made to look at the social needs of the area and make
sure they are part of an inclusive strategy for community regeneration for the whole of
Shirehampton.
The
Penpole Tenants Association serves the area around The Ridge - including the two tower
blocks Sedgewick and Barwick plus Oaktree and Grainger Courts, Wasborough, The Ridge
itself and the elderly persons accommodation at The Lawns and The Hermitage. The two tower
blocks are local authority owned but most of the rest of the housing in the area is owned
by four different Housing Associations - Knightstone, Guinness Trust and United Housing
Association.
All
the deprivation indices show this small area to be in the most social need in Shirehampton
and there is no doubt that if it was situated in one of the favoured areas for government
regeneration schemes its social needs would have been recognised and met by now. But being
situated in what is often perceived as fairly affluent Shirehampton it does not get access
to the funding it requires to tackle its problems. So it has been left to a fairly few
heroic members of the Penpole Tenants Association to struggle on in the face of much
adversity to make the best job they can of it. It should be said that the Tenants
Association acknowledges good support from the local Area Housing Office and its local
estate manager and also from the local police. The Home Beat Office holds regular
surgeries in the Methodist Church and numerous meetings have been held with more senior
officers to tackle anti-social behaviour from youths in the area.
The
Guinness Trust provides the Tenants Association with a small community centre at No. 60
The Ridge next to the playpark area on a yearly peppercorn rent. From here the Association
runs regular social events from its own resources. These include the Tuesday Luncheon Club
with 32 members, coffee mornings, bingo, socials, trips out, and other one off events. hi
the past there was an attempt to run a junior youth club for 5-10 year olds - the Penpole
Club -but unruly behaviour and severe damage to a pool table and other equipment forced
the Club to close. This episode perhaps illustrates the problems the T.A. faces in that
they are generous spirited and positive enough to try and provide some answers to problems
caused by local children and youth but lack the necessary resources to effectively
maintain them. The antisocial behaviour that causes concern to everyone along the High
Street in the evenings spills over regularly along the streets in the Penpole T.A. area
and is an ever present problem for them. In a way this small organisation has been left to
sort out some Shire wide problems all on its own with virtually no resources.
Some
recent examples of anti-social behaviour have passed into local folklore - the pulling
down of the advertising hoarding outside Alldays and dragging it into the road, the
setting on fire of a hedgehog, the robberies in the bungalows at The Lawns and daylight
robberies from shops in. the High Street. These compound the fears of many older people to
set foot outside their doors in the evenings. The concerns of the Traders are echoed by
the Penpole Tenants Association. Drug taking and the finding of needles in. the street and
play area are reported quite often, families not keeping their children under control and
causing a nuisance to others and incidents of racial harassment are reported by the Area
Office and the police.
The Tenants Association feels that the properties owned by the Housing Associations are not properly managed and anti-social behaviour by their tenants, children and visitors has no visible consequences. This is a view shared by the Area Housing Office. There is no doubt that the Housing Associations need to be brought into a local partnership to effectively deal with anti-social behaviour from their tenants and work with other community organisations to take some community safety initiatives.
There
have also been problems caused by the housing of Care in the Community individuals in the
tower blocks and the comparative havoc one or two people with personality disorders can
cause in a small community.
Neighbourhood
Watch has not worked effectively in the area when it has been tried but the Penpole
Tenants Association still searches for positive solutions rather than remaining purely
pessimistic. There is no doubt that a big step forward would be the provision of some
detached youth workers in the area whether from a church organisation such as being
thought about by the Baptist Church or from the local authority. Presently there is no
detached youth work provision from Groveleaze that reaches up into the High Street and
Penpole area and this is a situation that urgently needs rectifying. I would say that if
there is one urgent quick fix needed in Shire it is the provision of detached youth
workers in this area. It has to be asked whether spending £45,000 on keeping (Groveleaze Youth Centre open
to provide one youth work session a week when these resources could be re-directed to much
better effect along the High Street area is money wisely spent!
The
Tenants Association has indicated it would be willing to use its community room again for
some junior youth club use if they could be provided with the expertise and resources to
run it. The T.A. has also suggested that the empty site next to Alldays - apparently once
earmarked for a library - could be used for a youth club. Certainly some youth provision
would be money better spent than on CCTV which often only moves a problem round the
corner. The Tenants Association has also expressed its willingness to see some sort of
Drugs Project Drop-In facility in the area maybe provided by the Drugs Project at Lawrence
Weston. A desire for better liaison with Portway School over the behaviour of pupils
leaving the school in the afternoons has also been voiced.
There
is no doubt that both the deprivation indices and the experience of those who live and
work there show the area around The Ridge to be in urgent need of more resources and
partnership working to solve its problems. There is a willing and positive Tenants
Association there so hopefully things can start to move forward. A major funding bid
perhaps around Community Safety or the prioritisation of the area by the mooted Community
Development Trust would be two possible ways forward. Either way local partnerships will
be the key.
The
Church on the High Street has been a mainstay of the community for many years. However its
long standing vicar has recently retired and there is an inevitable sense of
drift until a new incumbent is appointed.
St.
Marys Church Hall hosts a range of groups including a Sunday School, Toddlers Group,
Judo and Karate classes and one off events. The role of the Hall is about to be
transformed however by its becoming the base for the users of the now closed Portway
Centre providing activities and resources for people with learning difficulties and
run by the Social Services Dept. An active local campaign to keep the Portway Centre open
was unsuccessful so the fact that it has been able to re-locate to another community
building within Shirehampton is good news for its many local users. It is also a good
example of how the rejigging of community resources and some imaginative thinking about
the best location for the provision of different services can often produce a better
solution than a campaign to save existing provision no matter what! Lets hope this
partnership between Church and Social Services will prosper.
The
Church in Station Road is the most active of the Shire churches in its community work. It
hosts a number of very active groups including Caring Hands, Parent and
Toddler group, Coffee mornings, a youth club and junior football team and other regular
drop-in sessions. It is active in the local primary schools and in identifying social need
within the area. Its volunteers give support to pensioners with gardening on the Cotswold
Estate and they provide furniture for families in Hostel accommodation in Avonmouth.
The
Minister has been looking for better ways to deliver its community services by exploring
the possibility of taking over a High Street shop or even the now empty bingo Hall. In
particular the Church has been exploring how it can best meet some of the needs of young
people in the area and tackle some of the youth problems around the High Street area. This
may take the form of some detached youth work provision in outreach from the Hall or even
in a shop in the High Street. At the moment discussions are going on in the church about
the location of a youth work team in the area which would be a very welcome resource.
There would also be potential for working in partnership with organisations like the
Penpole Tenants Association who have expressed an interest in a weekly youth club
in their community room but do not currently have the resources to provide workers - or
even in using some of the other community buildings in the area.
Again
a long term focal point for the community in Station Road. The Church works in active
partnership with St. Bernards School and the school hall is used for a variety of
community activities.
The
Methodist Church, which was once a much larger complex including tennis courts and theatre
stretching up to The Ridge, retains a prominent position on the High Street. The present
Minister has been there for four years and is part of a move among the more recent church
incumbents to more partnership working among the churches than was the case in the past.
The Church Hall hosts a number of groups from Coffee Mornings to St. Johns Ambulance to
Womens Institute and will also host a weekly Luncheon Club with the Portway Centre
soon to be based at St. Marys Church Hall. The Church also employs a part-time
community worker to foster wider links within the local community which is a promising
move.
The
Church suffers from the same vandalism and youth problems as the rest of the High Street
area but is actively pursuing with the Baptist Church the possibility of some youth
provision in the immediate area. Sensing that young people are not clubbable
in the same way as in the 50s and that
their cultural interests and pursuits have also moved on the two churches are exploring
the idea of some sort of Drop-in Cyber-cafe which would appeal to youngsters
love of computer games and be staffed by qualified personnel. This is still at the early
discussion stage as yet and no venue has been fixed on. However this would be a very
welcome move and the churches might wish to form a wider partnership within Shirehampton
and explore a well thought out Community Safety / Crime distraction initiative which could
seek council or government funding, and involve substantial detached youth work input. In
the long term this would be a more sustainable and effective approach than CCTV and
alcohol bans on The Green. If we wish to move beyond hand-wringing then this is just the
kind of initiative worthy of wide community support. I have listed this here under the
Methodist Church but it should be emphasised that the Baptist Church has been very heavily
involved in the ongoing discussions.
3.7 BEACHLEY WALK CENTRE
Beachley Walk is the main contact point between young
children and their families and Social Services in Shirehampton. The Beachley Walk
Satellite Unit is an outreach group from the Freshways Pre-School Resource Centre at
Lawrence Weston and is managed by Bristol City Council Social Services Dept. It offers
various activities and support for children and their families experiencing difficulties
within the local community. These include Nursery sessions three times a week including
activities and support for parents; Family Days; Home visiting; Plan and Stay a
drop-in parent and toddler group; summer playscheme; Parents groups; Toy Library; and
access to Resource Workers for dealing with individual family problems.
The Centre also works closely with Health Visitors from
Shirehampton Health Centre and has an ethos of working in partnership with the local
community. It is Social Services only support unit for children and their parents in
Shirehampton and referrals can be made by Health Visitors, Social Workers and other
professionals. It is extremely valued by Health Visitors who lament the lack of pre-school
provision within an area of traditionally low incomes. Parenting skills and groups for
people with learning difficulties and disabilities are also run at Beachley Walk.
Although the Beachley Walk Unit is managed by Social
Services the management of the building has recently passed from Social Services to the
Early Years Directorate of the Education Dept. This has created some unease among other
users who se~ activities would not fall within the scope of Education. In the past such
users have been given free use of the building by Social Services but it is not clear how
much longer this will continue with the change in management of the building. Such regular
users are the A.U.S. Luncheon Club, Monday night Dragons Club for children with
disabilities, Happy Hearts, St. Johns Badger Club and a number of others including Life
Long Learning from Community Education.
The building, which like many other community resources
in Shire could be described as battered but well loved, also suffers from
repeated vandalism and anti-social behaviour from youths - often jointly with Jim
ONeill House opposite.
There is no doubt that Beachley Walk has provided a
valuable local lifeline for many families in Shire and one that it is essential to
maintain and support in the future.
This valued service operates twice a week with one
benefits advice worker at The Cottage next to Twyford House. It gives comprehensive advice
on all benefit/debt issues and will refer to other agencies as appropriate. The worker is
employed by A.U.S. through the Child Poverty Action Group and she estimates she has
brought into the area over £250,000 of unclaimed benefits in the last year. This service
is much in demand and certainly has the scope to expand if finances would allow. In view
of the Profile of Shirehampton as being a low-waged economy hovering just above benefit
level, but often dipping into it, such an expanded advice service should be a top priority
its value already demonstrated by the ¼ million pounds it brings into the area
every year. A.U.S. should be helped to access more resources to expand the service if they
wish.
A final problem is what will happen to The Cottage if
Twyford House is sold off and the prospective developer wishes to purchase the Cottage as
well to make any development more viable. In these circumstances AUS would be bound to
listen to offers so it is essential that a long-term home is found for the advice service
if this eventuality comes about.
Back to contents
It has to be said that Shirehampton is pretty weak on
partnership working both between professional workers from different agencies and
community groups themselves. There are a lot of self-reliant groups pursuing their own
agendas which is fine but a bit more partnership working might both solve problems quicker
and more readily access the bigger pots of funding which Shirehampton continually misses
out on.
4.1.1 KEEPING IN TOUCH WITH GROUPS IN THE
SIIIREHAMPTON AREA
This is a yearly lunchtime get-together for information
sharing facilitated by the Health Visitors and Freshways Centre. Otherwise Shirehampton
lacks any professional workers forum as exist in many other areas. An immediate step
to improve this situation could be the setting up of a monthly forum for just such
information sharing.
4.1.2 S.H.A.W.L.
Shirehampton, Henbury, Avonmouth and Lawrence Weston
Lifelong Learning Network is a partnership of the education providers in the area. It aims
to provide a wide range of lifelong learning provision which meets the needs of the local
community. It is facilitated by Bristol Community Education Service. Portway School and
Community Education are the regular Shirehampton attenders.
This was a good example of what can be achieved by
partnership working. Shire 2000 was established to celebrate the Millennium with a year
long series of events in Shirehampton and it proved very successful. The very useful
Shirehampton Directory a guide to local community groups was produced as
part of this partnership initiative.
4.2.1 SHIRE NEWSPAPER
Shire is a phenomenon! A Community Newspaper
which has been going non-stop for 28 years, has a circulation of 4,300 delivered entirely
by volunteers and is not only financially self-sufficient from its advertising revenue but
is able to give donations to other community projects such as the Shirehampton Directory.
I doubt if there is another community newspaper in the country that can boast such a
record and it is a most effective medium for publicising local community events and
raising issues of concern. Part of its success must lie in the basic continuing stability
of the community, with little transient population and often three generations of the same
family living in the area. This makes for a keenly felt sense of identity and shared
social history which is at the root of Shires popularity and longevity.
The challenge for Shire is to effectively
represent the younger voices of Shirehampton, their needs and concerns, as well as the
older community. If it can do this then it will in all probability provide Shirehampton
with its individual voice for another 25 Years and more!
This is a very successful website (www.shire.org.uk)
getting an ever increasing number of visitors from near and far and providing details on
local community organisations and events. It can be accessed at the Library.
Just to remain open is a success for many libraries
these days and Shirehampton Library continues to be very well used. It provides access to
the internet and a wealth of information leaflets. It provides a home for
Shire newspaper and holds a Community Diary where local groups can make sure
their events do not clash.
The local Development Plan for North Bristol details the
continued viability of the High Street area as a shopping centre while acknowledging the
need for an additional food shop. The Donaldson study of January 1998 suggested that the
health of the Shirehampton shopping area had gradually declined but had been worsened by
the opening of the regional shopping centre at Cribbs Causeway. The decline was not
irreversible however and the High Street shopping area retained an important top
up function.
The Planning Inspectorate report on the proposed Aldi
development on the Portway November 1998 also acknowledged the need for an
additional food shop but felt that the location of the proposed development would not
enhance the existing shopping centre. There was also considerable and articulate local
opposition to the Aldi development. There remains concern amongst individual traders that
the shopping area could decline further and that a good mix of traditional shops
the butchers for example needs to be maintained as against the proliferation of
Charity Shops.
Recent developments however point to the continued good
health of the shopping area e.g. the expansion of the betting shop and the opening of a
new Indian restaurant in Station Road. The closure of the Bingo Hall is a loss in
terms of leisure facilities but news of a possible planning application from Lidl to open
a supermarket on the site has opened a debate quite different in character to the
opposition created by the Aldi development. The location of the possible Lidl Store has
obvious potential knock-on benefits for the rest of the shopping area and should help to
ensure its long-term viability.
The 1991 Census shows a very high percentage of
the-population - 35% - to be without a car and this suggests that for many people the
shopping area fulfils much more than a top up function and will continue to
provide basic shopping facilities for a significant section of the population.
Another factor worthy of comment is Shirehamptons
Café Culture. The High Street Cafes are very well used and serve an important
social function as well as an economic one. In an informal way the cafes provide the
social cement which keeps the community
together. Many people out shopping spend considerable time in the cafes-- often during the
course of the day moving from one to another and back again - where they can exchange
gossip, news, chit chat and maintain friendships. People often talk about the uniqueness
of Shire and its special sense of identity and I believe the role of the cafes is
central to this. The Shire Cafes- are full of young and old, kids and grandparents, men
and women who will often stay talking for hours as old friends are greeted in and brought
in to the conversation. In a society where young and old often lead separate lives the
cafes break down these barriers and also the isolation that many young mums and
pensioners feel - and create a real social mix and community spirit. It could be added
that some of the small shops do much the same.
The Traders Association has been established for over
two years with 25-30 members. Though concerned with the well being of the whole community
through such events as its successful annual Funday, its prime aim is obviously to promote
the economic interests of the traders. In this their prime concern with community safety
will be echoed by many local residents.
The
Traders Association is increasingly concerned with thefts, robberies, vandalism and
anti-social behaviour in the High Street. Although often occurring in the evenings shop
thefts are becoming increasingly common in daytime. Many of the major traders -- Boots, Alldays, Woolworths, Lloyds Bank -- are
suffering repeated vandalism, smashed windows and criminal damage. This anti-social
behaviour often spills over into the area North of the High Street towards the tower
blocks and the sheltered accommodation causing further alarm and nuisance. Groups of
youths on The Green cause alarm to older people
who become frustrated with the apparent lack of police response. The police on the other
hand point out that often no crime is being committed and that it is just a question of
young people gathering in groups as they have done for generations. The crime figures for
Shirehampton show a small increase over the last few years but are still significantly
lower than many other parts of the City. The Traders
Association is asking the City Council to install CCTV cameras at three
locations in the High Street to deter such behaviour. However with the crime statistics as
they are and the ever present council financial restraints it is extremely unlikely that
any priority will be given to this scheme in the near future. A more- general Community
Safety approach involving many different organisations working in partnership, and in
particular the provision of detached youth workers in the High Street area in the
evenings, combined with improved community policing is more likely to find favour and
produce results. Substantial amounts-of funding for Community Safety initiatives have been
made available elsewhere in the City and its about time Shire got its snout in this
particular trough. A Youth facility somewhere nearer to the High Street would be a.
candidate for such funding and both the Baptist Church and Penpole Tenants Association
have expressed positive interest in examining possibilities.
There are three Local Authority Sheltered Accommodation
units in the area - Antonia Court, Stowe House, and Jim ONeill House. All are
popular locations for residents and provide their own mix of social activities. In
addition there are a number of private nursing homes.
The Ward has three weekly Luncheon Clubs for older
people:
(i)
At Beachley Walk on Wednesdays run by Avon University Settlement
(ii) At
No.16 The Ridge on Tuesdays run by the Penpole Tenants Association
(iii) At
Avonmouth Community Centre on Thursdays
The Beachley Walk Luncheon Club picks up from the four
Care Homes in the area. They have a maximum of 18 people and have in the past received
funding from the John James Trust and Richard Davis Trust. Although Social Services still
own the Beachley Walk building its running has been taken over by the Education Dept. so
that AUS do not feel entirely secure about its future.
Most of the Community Groups and churches run activities
for senior citizens. The Evergreens at the Public Hall has been going for 70 years and is
a good example of the self-reliance of Shire Community Groups in both its longevity and
the fact that it has never had a Local Authority grant in all those 70 years but thrived
on its only income its members weekly fees. It provides entertainment and trips
out. The Public Hall has recently added a Friday night Bingo session - being quick off the
mark to spot the gap in the market caused by the demise of the Bingo Hall!
The Tythe Barn Senior Citizens Club provides a similar
mix of social activities and entertainment. The Cotswold Community Association is run by
senior citizens and provides social activities and regular dances.
In general Shirehampton is a popular place for senior
citizens to live especially on the Cotswold Estate by the river. Pensioners living just
North of the High Street around The Lawns and The Hermitage are increasingly suffering
break-ins and disturbance from youths and the fear of crime especially in the
evenings along the High Street - is causing a deterioration in the quality of life for
many older people in Shirehampton.
4.7.1
COMMUNITY EDUCATION
The local Community Education provision formerly at
Twyford House and Stoke Lodge is now provided at the Public Hail where the Community
Education office is now based. The computer courses are well subscribed but for other
courses there is reported 50% less use than previously at Twyford House. This is mainly
caused by less people casually dropping in for information and going on to take up courses
as Twyford House was well known as the Community Education provider and the Hall is less
so. This may sort itself out over time but some people have indicated they felt more
comfortable dropping into Twyford House which was purely a Community Education facility
rather than the Hail where space has to be shared with the many other users. A lack of
private interview space has also been noted as a problem and one the Hail Management
Committee is actively looking at in its proposed internal revamp of part of the building.
In an area with a very high level of people with no
qualifications easily accessible community education provision is essential and any
Community Development Trust might like to see some shop front provision in the High Street
area. Providing basic skills for people to get into jobs will be a key point for many
local people to improve their quality of life and it is predominantly Shirehampton people
who make use of the existing classes.
Using other community resources such as schools and
other community buildings such as that on The Ridge or the Cotswold Community Centre might
be further possibilities.
The Community Education office is also the access point
for the Lifelong Learning, Widening Participation, and Family Learning Programmes which
should have major take up potential in Shire and fit well with the programmes ethos
of bringing non-traditional learners back into learning. To this end
Taster Sessions can be arranged for many courses and courses customised to
meet the learners needs. The Community Education Office is also part of the SHAWL
network detailed elsewhere.
4.7.2 PORTWAY COMMUNITY SCHOOL
The school is the main Secondary Education provider in
the area and the recent threat of closure of its sixth form will be a major blow for
children in the area who will have to face travelling much further to continue their
education. Again in an area of high levels of people having no qualifications such a
closure would seem to fly in the face of local need - perhaps another example of Shire
losing a valuable community facility and where a possible Community Development Trust
might give local people more hope of retaining valuable education resources.
The School works in co-operation with its partner
Primary Schools and is known for its excellence in music provision which leads to many
performances in the community. A Community Sports bid was mooted last year which aroused a
lot of local interest and could have led to widespread community use. This appears to have
stuttered somewhat but I understand that a bid for Sports College status is now back on
the agenda. This could have a major impact on youth provision in the area so it is
important that the school works in co-operation with its neighbouring community groups to
ensure maximum effectiveness on enhanced community use.
The School has sports fields along The Portway which are
let out for community use and to local football teams including the Shire Colts. It also
hosts a regular summer playscheme and has a very active Friends of Portway School support
group. The School could have a major impact on local regeneration initiatives and the more
it can develop partnerships with local groups and its neighbours along The Ridge the
better.
The three Primary Schools that serve the area are
St.Bernards, Shirehampton and Avon Schools. Shirehampton Primary School is a newly merged
school from the former Shirehampton Infants and Shirehampton Juniors which were situated
alongside each other.
The new Shirehampton Primary has quite properly been
concerned with making its transition into the one school as problem free as possible and
there is still building work to be undertaken.
All three schools let out their rooms to community
groups out of school hours and these must increasingly be seen as major resources for
community groups especially in areas where few other community facilities exist such as
the area in the immediate vicinity of Avon Primary. St Bernards School has the reverse
problem of being situated in Station Road where there are many other community buildings
available. All three schools will be feeder schools for the new Shire After-School Club if
funding is successfully acquired (decision in February 2001) and this will add a much
needed child care facility for working parents.
Any Community Development Trust structure that might
emerge in Shirehampton will have to enlist the Primary Schools as key players in the
community.
4.8 GROVELEAZE YOUTH CLUB
Groveleaze has been Shirehamptons Youth Club for
over 50 years and many older people have fond memories of their past times there. The
question has to be however whether Groveleaze is currently able to provide a service which
can meet the needs of local young people and the answer has to be that it currently does
not.
The entire Youth Service provision in Bristol is
currently under review following two highly critical reports and it is at present unclear
what the outcomes of this review will be and how the future of Groveleaze might be
affected. In terms of local service delivery however several points need to be made. The
Club was shut altogether for four months prior to the summer holidays following an
incident and is currently delivering only one session of youth work per week in the
building. For a service that costs £45,000 per year to run this cannot be a good return
on the outlay.
Occasional sessions of outreach work are delivered on an
irregular basis around the Beachley Walk area but no outreach work is undertaken in the
High Street area where most young people gather these days and problems are caused for
older people.
There is no doubt that youth service provision in
Shirehampton needs a complete revamp. Whether Groveleaze is now in the wrong place for a
youth club and somewhere nearer the High Street area is needed or whether more resources
are needed to provide outreach workers are two of the issues that need resolving. At the
present time it is the Churches who are thinking about meeting the current needs rather
than Groveleaze. A comprehensive Community Safety strategy needs to be worked out between
interested partner organisations in Shire in which youth work plays a prominent role.
Whether the Groveleaze building itself still has a role to play in that provision remains
open to question.
There is currently debate over the future of the
swimming pool and a possible revamp of facilities at the Robin Cousins Sports Centre.
There are currently empty rooms and courts out of use at the Robin Cousins Centre and it
has been suggested that these would make a suitable location for a new youth club facility
as many young people are already visiting the centre. Again the existing swimming pool
site could be sold off for development and the money used to develop facilities elsewhere
or the pool could be retained, as recommended by the Citizens Jury, or re-located to the
Robin Cousins Centre. Whatever the outcome it is a fact that, just as on other current
issues such as Park And Ride, unless people come together to take a strategic vision for
the whole of Shirehampton issues will be resolved on an ad-hoc basis by those who shout
loudest or live nearest to a particular proposal with other less sure voices going
unheard.
Back to contents
5.
Summary Of Main Issues Raised By
Profile
1. Community Buildings - We have lost a number of these recently including Twyford House and the Portway Centre. We dont want to lose any more!
2. Community Safety - Many older people are scared to go out in the evenings because of anti-social behaviour and crime especially around the High Street area.
3. Youth Work - The role of Groveleaze Youth Club and the urgent need for detached youth work elsewhere in Shirehampton needs to be looked at.
4. Funding - Shirehampton does not qualify for any of the major pots of government or City Council funding such as the Single Regeneration Budget or the Northern Arc. Yet there are very real unmet needs here. How can we best access better funding for the area?
5. Poverty - There are wide variations of affluence within Shirehampton but the data shows many people with low incomes and in need of extra support and resources. How can we obtain and direct those resources to those areas of Shirehampton most in need of them?
6. Neglect - Some parts of Shirehampton, such as the Lower High Street, feel neglected and left out from the rest of the Village. Does Shirehampton start half-way up the High Street as the new signs indicate? Is there a Shire Village and then the rest of Shirehampton separate? How can we make sure that we have a genuinely inclusive community?
7. Health - Shirehampton has some of the highest figures for premature death and low birthweight babies in Bristol. Why is this? Is it important to find out why? Do health professionals such as the Health Visiting Team need extra resources?
8. Voluntary Groups - Shirehampton has a wealth of voluntary groups but some are struggling with limited resources in difficult circumstances. How can we support them?
9. Leisure Facilities - What is the future of the Swimming Pool? Where are other facilities most needed especially for younger people?
10. Partnership working - Do we work together in Shirehampton
enough? Do we need a regular forum where statutory and voluntary agencies, including the
schools and churches who have an important role to play, come together? How can we develop
a strategic vision for the whole of Shirehampton? Or do we need one at all? Could existing
community facilities and buildings be re-jigged to meet local needs better
than at present?
Back to contents
6. Recommendations for the future
1. Establish some form of partnership working among the
different organisations to develop a strategic vision for Shirehampton. This could take
the form of a Community Development Trust or an Urban Parish Council or Area Forum but
partnership working will be essential if resources are to be gained to meet identified and
shared problems.
2. A major Community Safety initiative should be taken
along the High Street! Ridge area involving substantial youth work provision and a major
funding bid.
3 The case needs to be made that poverty is a major
issue in Shirehampton. Low incomes, premature death and health inequalities need to be
addressed with urgency and Shirehampton needs to get its fair share of access to
government or Local Authority funding programmes from which it is currently excluded.
4. We need to build an inclusive community. For many
people Shirehampton (at least during the daytime!) has the feel of a village with its
sense of shared history and separate identity from the rest of Bristol where friendships
and family links go back generations. There is also a proud tradition of self-reliance and
shared experience which needs to be valued and maintained. But for many other people life
in Shire is not like that. Lets stop pretending that it is!
Back to contents